omit, Matthew 5:46 , Matthew 8:8a (in all Galilee) B C 157 cop syr eth copbo, Matthew 13:57 b Patristic Quotations of the New Testament, Part 2 The Flood to the Deliverance From Egypt, Part 3-Deliverance From Egypt to Israels First King, Part 4 Israels First King to Captivity in Babylon, Part 5-Captivity in Babylon to the Completion of the Book of Malachi, Part 6-From Malachi to the Birth of Jesus, Part 8-Jesus Resurrection to death of the Apostle John. , Matthew 12:38 [8]In the Book of Psalms this scribe has 35 times instead of , while scribe A normally uses an abbreviated form . C27334171157 892 , Matthew 15:27 Nevertheless, there are many differences between these two manuscripts. Erroll F. Rhodes. Most translators decided to keep that part of Mark 16 in the Bible, but with a note or footnote that those verses . , Matthew 24:30 F A quick response would be that they are very much mistaken and doing exactly what Agnostic NT Textual scholar Bart D. Ehrman does, misrepresenting the information. This is simply exaggeration and a misrepresentation of the evidence. This variant is supported by Vetus Latina and some Sahidic manuscripts. For example, in John 1:4 Sinaiticus and Codex Bezae are the only Greek manuscripts with textual variant (in him is life) instead of (in him was life). What about the ~3500 differences between Vaticanus and Sinaiticus just in the gospels alone? Codex Sinaiticus differs in various ways from the other sources. syrsin f13 [4] Dirk Jongkind (2007),Scribal Habits of Codex Sinaiticus, Gorgias Press LLC, p. 90. A K X ( Wf1700 copbo)f13Byz , Matthew 8:29 [25], The original writing was retraced by a later scribe (usually dated to the 10th or 11th century), and the beauty of the original script was spoiled. The Codex Vaticanus is believed to be among the oldest copies of the Greek Bible in existence. B050, Matthew 6:33 In 1844, 43 leaves of a 4th-century biblical codex (a collection . [6] Dirk Jongkind (2007),Scribal Habits of Codex Sinaiticus, Gorgias Press LLC, p. 77-78. A Modern analysis identifies at least three scribes: Scribe B was a poor speller, and scribe A was not very much better; the best scribe was D.[4]Metzger states: scribe A had made some unusually serious mistakes.[5]Scribes A and B more often usednomina sacrain contracted forms ( contracted in all occurrences, contracted except in 2 occurrences), scribe D more often used forms uncontracted. Along with Codex Vaticanus Graecus 1209, Codex Sinaiticus is generally described as the most ancient surviving basically 'complete' Christian Bible. [14]Milne and Skeat have observed that the superscription to 1 Maccabees was made by scribe D, while the text was written by scribe A. D Scribes and Correctors of the Codex Sinaiticus, (London: British Museum, 1938), p. 94. This was shown by Gordon Fee (in Codex Sinaiticus in the Gospel of John: A Contribution to Methodology in Establishing Textual Relationships, in New Testament Studies 15, 1968-69). [34]The same distigmai were observed inCodex Fuldensis, especially in the section containing 1 Cor 14:3435. Were Almost All Greek New Testament Manuscript Textual Variants [Errors] Created Before 200 A.D.? B D , Matthew 7:4b , Matthew 13:5a [] (and asked him) 5 When there's doubt over which tradition preserves the correct reading, the Alexandrian text wins more often than not, given that Codex Sinaiticus, Vaticanus, and Alexandrinus are all largely within this category, and these three are among our earliest complete Greek bibles. Scribes and Correctors of the Codex Sinaiticus, (London: British Museum, 1938), p. 94. . W (f1)f13pc, Mark 10:19 If this is so, material beginning with1 Samuelto the end of Esther is Origens copy of theHexapla. [13] Bruce M. Metzger (1991). 6667. B, Matthew 13:3 , Matthew 10:25a They are nothing and much was corrected by the more competent scribe and the corrector. * D In the Gospels alone, Vaticanus has 197 particular readings, while Sinaiticus has 443. Plus textual changes for theological bias. A B2C D X 5658921009 1071 1195 1216 1230 1241 1253 1344 1365 1646 2174 Byz . D [24]Skeat agreed that the writing style is very similar to that of Sinaiticus, but there is not enough evidence to accept identity of scribes; the identity of the scribal tradition stands beyond dispute. a b k, Matthew 6:32b [20], Two correctors worked on the manuscript, one (B2) contemporary with the scribes, the other (B3) in about the 10th or 11th century, although the theory of a first corrector, B1, proposed by Tischendorf was rejected by later scholars. 1. Codex Vaticanus is a manuscript that is equally as old as Codex Sinaiticus. there is a significant difference between manuscripts. Biblical manuscript List of New Testament uncials Differences between codices Sinaiticus and Vaticanus Fifty Bibles of Constantine Gutenberg Bible Notes . B There is at worst a 5% difference between the consensus text and the majority text. C D K L W X mgf1333 892 1009 1010 1071 1216 1230 1242 1253 1365 1646 2148 Byz Lect it vg syrscopboethro 105112. Codex Sinaiticus in the Gospel of John, NTS 15, pp. [10]Milne and Skeat characterized scribe B as careless and illiterate.[11]The work of the original scribe is designated by thesiglum*. C L W0119f1Byz, Matthew 15:17 John has more differences than the other gospels because in Codex Sinaiticus, John 1:18:38 and parts of chapters 16 and 21 have early Western Christian writing ancestry.[4]. According to Hort Sinaiticus and Vaticanus were derived from a common original much older, "the date of which cannot be later than the early part of the second century, and may well be yet earlier". Example of differences between Sinaiticus and Vaticanus in Matthew 1:1819: 18 , 19 , 18 , 19 . Mark: 567 2D, Matthew 14:19b 892 What New Testament Textual Studies Sources Do We Have? L l Please subscribe and leave a 5 star review! We can compare that to the larger Sinaiticus which measures 15" x 13.6", roughly the size of a coffee table book today. , Matthew 12:31 Bible translation differences between the NIV and NKJV. L [19]Tischendorfs view was accepted byFrederic G. Kenyon, but contested byT. C. Skeat, who examined the codex more thoroughly. Andrews is the Chief Translator of the Updated American Standard Version (UASV). , Matthew 12:1 [35], Onpage 1512, next to Hebrews 1:3, the text contains an interesting marginal note,Fool and knave, leave the old reading and do not change it! , , which may suggest that unauthorised correcting was a recognized problem inscriptoriums.[36]. , Matthew 24:31 [59] . cC2D copbo, Matthew 14:35 copsa, Matthew 9:4a , Matthew 10:16a copbo 33 C Constantin von Tischendorf,Novum Testamentum Vaticanum. We will use to identify Codex Sinaiticus herein. ), Apostolic Fathers (e.g., Clement, Ignatius, Polycarp), Apologists (e.g., Justin Martyr, Clement, Tertullian), Church Fathers (e.g., Gregory, Jerome, Augustine, Ambrose), Flawed Biblical Historical Literary Criticism, PART 8-Jesus Resurrection to the Death of the Apostle John. The Codex Sinaiticus is named after the Monastery of Saint Catherine, Mount Sinai, where it had been preserved until the middle of the nineteenth century. WHAT DOES THE BIBLE REALLY TEACH ABOUT ________? D cop, Matthew 8:6 EDWARD D. ANDREWS (AS in Criminal Justice, BS in Religion, MA in Biblical Studies, and MDiv in Theology) is CEO and President of Christian Publishing House. , Matthew 11:23b For example, the resurrection narrative at the end of Mark (16:9-20) is absent from the Codex Sinaiticus. D D L W f1229923725149 f1 As is indicated by its name, it is housed in the Vatican Library at Rome, first becoming known in 1475. [3] Westcott, B. F. and Hort, F. J. What about the ~3500 differences between Vaticanus and Sinaiticus just in the gospels alone? D, Matthew 13:39b Payne discovered the first distigme while studying the section 1 Cor 14.3435 of the codex. , Matthew 9:35b Herman C. Hoskier (18641938) Christian Publishing House Blog, The Byzantine Kr/family 35 Text-Form (1261-1453 C.E.) k Lets not even mention the end of revelation. , Matthew 10:23 The words of CHRIST JESUS and the Apostles have been changed, truncated, and removed from our Scriptures, based on these "old" , corrupt Codices. Cf13 The Christian Apologists (150 220 C.E. Textkritik des Neuen Testaments(in German). B Wf1333 They are nothing and much was corrected by the more competent scribe and the corrector. L Who Wrote the Bible Book ________? , Matthew 9:21 [3] Westcott, B. F. and Hort, F. J. (into their own country) f1157a b g1vg cop, Matthew 2:13 (till) Matthew 1:3 (Zerah) B, supported byPapyrus 1 (Zerah) Sinaiticus, Matthew 1:12/13 (begot) , Matthew 1:19 (put to shame) 1, supported byf1 (to make example) *.2CLWf13Byz, Matthew 1:20 B Lf11241 C D WZf13Byz, Matthew 1:25 (till) (till his), Matthew 2:12 (into their country) (into their own country) f1157a b g1vg cop, Matthew 2:13 372copsa (appeared in a dream), Matthew 3:6 (by him) , Matthew 3:11 (I indeed) 892 (I) , Matthew 3:15 (it fitting us) cop it syr (it fitting for us) , Matthew 4:8 (showed) (showed) (showed) D 372, Matthew 4:13 (by the sea) W (by the sea) B (by the sea) D372, Matthew 4:23 (in Galilee) (in all Galilee) B C 157 cop syr eth (all Galilee) D, Matthew 4:23b , Matthew 4:24 (whole of Syria) 157 (all Syria) , Matthew 5:9 C D 13-124-556 B, Matthew 5:18 B106 , Matthew 5:19 , omit * D W d g2r2, Matthew 5:28 236 W M , Matthew 5:30 B d k syr cop, Matthew 5:31 * syr copbo B, Matthew 5:37 6168245700, Matthew 5:39 W 157892 B D E, Matthew 5:41 D B L M S U E G K V syrcur, Matthew 5:42 * y B, Matthew 5:45 (and it is raining on the righteous and the unrighteous) Bomit, Matthew 5:46 Bmit * copbosyrcur, Matthew 6:2 (amen, amen) 13 (amen) B, Matthew 6:7 (hypocrites) syrcur (gentiles), Matthew 6:8 (your Father) * D L W Z 0170f1f13Byz (God your Father) 1B copsa, Matthew 6:15 Bomit Df1, Matthew 6:16 syrcureth , Matthew 6:16 244 g1k syrp B , copbo , Matthew 6:18a , Matthew 6:20 1 892 syrcur , Matthew 6:21 B copbo syrp, Matthew 6:22a , Matthew 6:23 W 33 B cop it syr, Matthew 6:25a f1892 a b ff1k l vg syrccopsa B Wf1333 copsa L 0233Byz, Matthew 6:32a N f13157 892 B a b k, Matthew 6:32b 228237 B050, Matthew 6:33 () g k cop eth E W 050, Matthew 7:3 N 235 050, Matthew 7:4b , Matthew 7:12 B copbo, Matthew 7:13a B bomit a b c h k, Matthew 7:14 * X B2bN W 209, Matthew 7:17 cop , Matthew 7:22 B, Matthew 7:27b omit, Matthew 7:28 , Matthew 8:1 B C W b Z *, Matthew 8:3a 124 B, Matthew 8:4b B C, Matthew 8:5 W cop, Matthew 8:7b , Matthew 8:8a cop, Matthew 8:10 4 f1 , Matthew 8:12 , Matthew 8:13 C E M N U X omit B, Matthew 8:18 W 12243copsasyrcur, sin 1 22 cC N 108106, Matthew 8:22 B syrcur 33 b c k q syrs, Matthew 8:26 f1f1322 , Matthew 8:29 copbo copsa, Matthew 9:4a C D K L W X mgf1333 892 1009 1010 1071 1216 1230 1242 1253 1365 1646 2148 Byz Lect it vg syrscopboethro B N txtf1565 700 1079 1195 1546184,313, 1627, 1761 syrhgoth arm? , Matthew 14:36 The literal meaning of 'Codex Sinaiticus' is the Sinai Book. These two manuscripts were not written in the same scriptorium. syrp, Matthew 10:12 [35], Onpage 1512, next to Hebrews 1:3, the text contains an interesting marginal note,Fool and knave, leave the old reading and do not change it! , , which may suggest that unauthorised correcting was a recognized problem inscriptoriums.[36]. Partly due to the fact that ancient manuscripts containing the Received Text were worn out by use, while the Alexandrian textbase manuscripts were preserved by the dry conditions of Egypt, some have sought to discredit the Received Text because they say it is not ancient. Today, we'll cover the Codex Vaticanus, which belongs to the Vatican library. C W 28 700 1010 Byz c f q Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus, two of great uncial codices, representatives of the Alexandrian text-type, are considered excellent manuscript witnesses of the text of the New Testament. Codex SinaiticusandCodex Vaticanus, two ofgreat uncial codices, representatives of theAlexandrian text-type, are considered excellentmanuscriptwitnesses of the text of theNew Testament. Archived from the original on 2011-05-31. (see Mark 7:10) aB D 084f1f13700 892 ita, aur, b, c, d, e, ff1, ff2, g1, l q vg syrc, s, pcopsa, bo, fayarm eth geo 892 B 59115238 It is an majuscule manuscript that dates to the mid-fourth century and contains almost the entire Christian canon in Greek, with most of the Apocrypha, acording to Patheos. D Another (in the Galilee) (in all the Galilee)B. Manuscripts of the Greek Bible: An Introduction to Palaeography, Oxford:Oxford University Press, p. 77. THE Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus differences are insignificant in the extreme. However, there are a number of differences between Sinaiticus and Vaticanus. When, why, where or how were entire Bible verses and chapters added and removed from God's Scripture? The Critical Text is the corrupt one! Paul Anderson, similarly, with B and Aleph varying over 1,000+ differences in John alone (3,000+ in the 4 Gospels).. Plus textual changes for theological bias. , Wieland Willker (2008). , Matthew 10:11 , Matthew 13:48 The verses are printed on sheets . John Miller on Social media makes a typical comment: You think the TR is corrupt? D This article is from Wikipedia but has been updated and will be updated even more so by Edward D. Andrews for Christian Publishing House. [17] Bruce M. Metzger, (1992). Christian Publishing House Blog, Scribe A wrote most of the historical and poetical books of the Old Testament, almost the whole of the New Testament, and the Epistle of Barnabas, Scribe B was responsible for the Prophets and for the Shepherd of Hermas, Scribe D wrote the whole of Tobit and Judith, the first half of 4 Maccabees, the first two-thirds of the Psalms, and the first five verses of Revelation, * original text of Codex Sinaiticus before scribal correction(s), B* original text of Codex Vaticanus before scribal correction(s). 105112. There are a number of differences between Sinaiticus and Vaticanus; Hoskier enumerated 3036 differences: Matt-656 Mark-567 Luke-791 John-1022 Total3036. W, Matthew 15:17 Introduction to the Study of the Gospels, p.40. The Codex Vaticanus is perhaps the most important of all the manuscripts of the Holy Scripture. copsacopboarm syr, Matthew 14:15b (put to shame) 1, supported byf1 B , Matthew 9:9a Curt Niccum,The voice of the MSS on the Silence of the Women: , NTS 43 (1997), pp. C2431241 f13892 Erroll F. Rhodes. The difference can be illustrated with copies of the Bible. But there are earlier . Milne & T.C. 2B L 892 As an illustration: When Saul realized that the LORD was with David and that his daughter Michal loved David (NIV) while another manuscript has. , Matthew 11:29 E G K V , Matthew 13:14 Comparison of codices Sinaiticus and Vaticanus, Learn how and when to remove this template message, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Comparison_of_codices_Sinaiticus_and_Vaticanus&oldid=1063839150, Articles needing cleanup from August 2018, Cleanup tagged articles with a reason field from August 2018, Wikipedia pages needing cleanup from August 2018, All articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases, Articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases from September 2010, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 3.0, This page was last edited on 5 January 2022, at 05:18. Codex Vaticanus (CODEX B), a Greek manuscript, the most important of all the manuscripts of Holy Scripture. (all Galilee) D, Matthew 4:23b D, Matthew 13:32 Codex Vaticanus dates to about 300 to 325 C.E. B b [2] Herman C. Hoskier, Codex B and its Allies, Bernard Quaritch, London 1914. 242255. W syrcur, Matthew 10:33b [7]His errors are the substitution of for , and for in medial positions, both equally common. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. Eth geo 76 547 , Matthew 9:4b copsasyr , Matthew 9:6a 372 D, Matthew 9:6b , copsaand copboused different terms, but every concerned to , Matthew 9:9a omit L1071copbo, Matthew 9:9b copsa copbo, Matthew 9:9c Df121892 B, Matthew 9:10a B, Matthew 9:10c 24350omit B, Matthew 9:16 , Matthew 9:17 301copsa , Matthew 9:18 13 157 cC D E M X N W S V , Matthew 9:19 C D 3341 , Matthew 9:21 D , Matthew 9:24 61omit B, Matthew 9:26 C N8699238348 D B, Matthew 9:27a D , Matthew 9:27b B, Matthew 9:28a D, Matthew 9:28b D B, Matthew 9:28c copbo , Matthew 9:28d C , Matthew 9:30a B D N C, Matthew 9:30b D B, Matthew 9:31 , Matthew 9:35a , Matthew 9:35b omit B C D S , Matthew 9:35c L 13 124omit B, Matthew 10:3 17124 892 cop D122 . The folios of Codex Vaticanus measure a perfectly square 10.6" x 10.6", which is a relatively large book by today's standards but not oversized. D, Matthew 13:24 [2] Fee, G. D.(1968-9). Grand Rapids, Michigan:William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. omit Df1, Matthew 6:16 Will Kinney. [13]Readings that they introduced are designated by the siglum a. , Matthew 8:1 D W , Matthew 10:33a The book in question is Codex Sinaiticus, often referred to as the oldest Bible in the world. F P X , Matthew 14:22c The alternative term itacism refers to the new pronunciation of the name of the letter eta as [ita] after the change. , Matthew 9:4b See: Codex Vaticanus Graece. C [33]He suggested that distigmai indicate lines where another textual variant was known to the person who wrote the umlauts. The difference between Codex Vatican and Sinaiticus is so insignificant to be inconsequential unlike the Byzantine text, which had copyists adding and removing phrases, sentences, entire verses and even an entire section of verses, as well as conflating the text by combining two or more readings for harmonization purposes. Codex Sinaiticus includes the apocryphal books (Esdras, Tobit, Judith, I and IV Maccabees, Wisdom . 33 b c k q syrs, Matthew 8:26 According to Dean Burgon: "It is in fact easier to find two consecutive . rest of mss, Matthew 13:55 The Codex Sinaiticus (Shelfmark: London, British Library, Add MS 43725), designated by siglum [Aleph] or 01 (in the Gregory-Aland numbering of New Testament manuscripts), 2 (in the von Soden numbering of New Testament manuscripts), or Sinai Bible is a fourth century Christian manuscript of a Greek Bible, containing the majority of the Greek Old Testament, including the Apocrypha . These were readings, in each group of three, taken as representative of the three basic text-types in vogue at the time, and, for what it is worth, Hutton showed that Sinaiticus and Vaticanus agreed (where both were extant) in 191 of the 175 variants, or 70% of the time.104 In 1914, Hoskier devoted 381 pages to the differences between . ), London 1939. The date of these markings are disputed among scholars and are discussed in a link below. W D, Matthew 15:12 It also goes by the name "B," while the Codex . The term iotacism refers to the letter iota, the original sign for, with which these vowels came to merge. Codex SINAITICUS and Codex VATICANUS have been used to undermine the authority of the Scriptures, as we have seen in the modern English translations. The only reason why we have that Sinaiticus is that it was discarded. So, for example, Papyrus 75 has the identifying symbol the Gothic P and a superscript number (75). Just to be clear, no. Sinaiticusa C Z 1 1322 I think I read there's like 14,000 differences between the Book of the Mount of Sinai and the Bible that we basically use today, which like the King James Bible, is taken from the Textus receptors, which is kind of a conglomerate of various manuscripts that were written in Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek. 99 253 892 [18] Gregory, C. R. (1900). , Matthew 7:12 Codex Sinaiticus is designated by siglum , and Codex Vaticanus by alpha character B. 19: 1st, 2nd, & 3rd Letters of John & Jude, Introduction to New Testament Textual Studies, Technical Terms for New Testament Textual Criticism. [21] H.J.M. * y M299 Manuscripts repeatedly proven to have incorrect readings loose respectability. , Matthew 10:34 (provided for Him) , Luke 8:45 V 69 We will not that the oldest and Alexandrian manuscripts are named after the material that they were made from, papyrus. omit Sinaiticus 1 700 892, Matthew 16:9 Mostcritical editionsof theGreek New Testamentgive precedence to these two chief uncial manuscripts, and the majority oftranslationsare based on their text. The third is the Western Text. syrcur, sin, Matthew 13:36a The Text of theNew Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption and Restoration, (3rd Ed. I think it's our most * 700 pc copsa It was discovered in the 19th century, surpassing Vaticanus as the most complete manuscript. omit a b c h k, Matthew 7:14 The Old Testament was written in Hebrew, and the New Testament was written in Koine Greek and Aramaic. , Matthew 14:26 , Matthew 6:23 [18], According to Tischendorf, the manuscript was written by three scribes (A, B, C), two of whom appear to have written the Old Testament and one the entire New Testament. The Byzantine Majority Text and the Textus Receptus have ~2000 differences between them. , Matthew 6:21 B N txtf1565 700 1079 1195 1546184,313, 1627, 1761 syrhgoth arm? [14] Bruce M. Metzger; Ehrman, Bart D. (2005),The Text of the New Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption, and Restoration. The two most prominent of the corrupt Alexandrian codices are called the Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus: Codex Siniaticus (Aleph or a) was put in the trash heap by the monks of St Catherine's Monastery. Two important decisions that Bible translators must make include: . f13, Matthew 10:4a C D L N 12233118892 , Matthew 10:11 1699243892 syrp, Matthew 10:12 D L W f1229923725149omit , Matthew 10:14b f1361892cop syrp , Matthew 10:14c C27334171157 892 B, Matthew 10:15 , Matthew 10:16b B L 157, Matthew 10:21 75235700 , Matthew 10:24 F M W , Matthew 10:25a , Matthew 10:25b N L U D, Matthew 10:28 copbo C D L X syrsin E cW , Matthew 10:3 C V , Matthew 10:33a L C W syrcur, Matthew 10:33b V X , Matthew 10:34 h k vg , Matthew 10:37 omit B D, Matthew 11:4 243 D W , Matthew 11:8 , Matthew 11:15 omit D32700, Matthew 11:19 , Matthew 11:21 C U, Matthew 11:23a D W , Matthew 11:23b B , Matthew 11:24b , Matthew 11:27 71 , Matthew 11:29 , Matthew 12:1 W W, Matthew 12:10 D L W106 , Matthew 12:11 238251253892 , Matthew 12:22a , Matthew 12:22b , Matthew 12:29 C W 892 D , Matthew 12:30 33 , Matthew 12:31 , Matthew 12:32a , Matthew 12:32b * corr, Matthew 12:35 W C L U , Matthew 12:37 , Matthew 12:38 59 , Matthew 12:44a F G X , Matthew 12:44b C , Matthew 12:46 Sinaiticusa C Z D L omit, Matthew 12:49 B, Matthew 13:3 D L , Matthew 13:4 D, Matthew 13:5 , Matthew 13:5a , Matthew 13:10 , Matthew 13:14 C D F G M N U V , Matthew 13:15 C D, Matthew 13:25 1 1322 C D W , Matthew 13:27 L X N W, Matthew 13:28a 157 , Matthew 13:28b C D N, Matthew 13:30a * L D C b N , Matthew 13:30b C E L B D bN W , Matthew 13:30d 1 B2 D, Matthew 13:32 * D B2, Matthew 13:33 L M U X f1328 C2431241 omit D syrcur, sind k, Matthew 13:34 61 D c W, Matthew 13:35a 1 , Matthew 13:35b B b1 syrcur, sin, Matthew 13:36a 273 a b h q , Matthew 13:36b B 0242 bC D L W010602330250f1f13Byz, Matthew 13:39a L D, Matthew 13:39b omit, Matthew 13:41 F , Matthew 13:42 D , Matthew 13:44b 2861435 , Matthew 13:48 V , Matthew 13:50 D 258 , Matthew 13:54 rest of mss, Matthew 13:55 * D E F G M S U V X aB C N K L W copbo, Matthew 13:57 b D f13892 E G K M N S V L X W, Matthew 14:1 C Z D, Matthew 14:9 D , Matthew 14:15a 1 D copsacopboarm syr, Matthew 14:15b C Z eth k , Matthew 14:15c 238 , Matthew 14:16 D 61 , Matthew 14:17 , Matthew 14:19a 2D, Matthew 14:19b C2E F G D C L X, Matthew 14:22a C 892, Matthew 14:22b C D F P X , Matthew 14:22c 1 3399124 700 892 , Matthew 14:23 omit251, Matthew 14:24 f13 , Matthew 14:26 1 Df13pc * 700 pc copsa 084f11241 1424 pc copbopt C L W0106Byz syrhcopbopt, Matthew 14:28a 33 , Matthew 14:28b 892 syrsin , Matthew 14:29 * copsa C 700 cC2D copbo, Matthew 14:35 , Matthew 14:36 892 , Matthew 15:3 , Matthew 15:4 (see Mark 7:10) aB D 084f1f13700 892 ita, aur, b, c, d, e, ff1, ff2, g1, l q vg syrc, s, pcopsa, bo, fayarm eth geo *, b C K L W X 010633 565 1010 1071 1230 1241 1253 1344 1365 2174 Byz, Matthew 15:5 , Matthew 15:6 Cf13 D 892 F G N W , Matthew 15:11a , Matthew 15:11b cop D, Matthew 15:12 D copsa C, Matthew 15:14 D L Z 253 C, Matthew 15:15 W, Matthew 15:17 D 33 238f13 C L W0119f1Byz, Matthew 15:17 381 , Matthew 15:17 99 253 892 B, Matthew 15:22 * f13892 D cM299 C (4), Matthew 15:22 B D 56 58 700 , Matthew 15:27 B , Matthew 15:31 C D U gr B, Matthew 15:31 B 59115238 N 48,49 , Matthew 15:31 B Domit Sinaiticus 1 700 892, Matthew 16:9 omit X, Matthew 16:12 ff1syrc 33 2 L 892 1009 1241 f1 C W 28 700 1010 Byz c f q D f13565 a b ff2syrs, Matthew 17:10 L Z W, Matthew 17:17 , Matthew 18:7 , Matthew 18:14 DcK L W X f128 565 Dgr1646 2148 B f1333 700 892 1010 1216 1230 1241 1253 Byz, Matthew 18:16 700 B L l D, Matthew 19:7 , Matthew 19:10 , Matthew 19:12 , Matthew 19:22 , Matthew 21:16 , Matthew 21:28 , Matthew 21:33 V 69 , Matthew 22:1 , Matthew 22:11 , Matthew 23:3 , Matthew 23:8 Sinaiticus*, 2, Bezae, Regius, Koridethi, 1010, 1241, 1424, Byz,292* Sinaiticus1, Vaticanus, 33, 892,292cor, Matthew 24:9 , Matthew 24:24 , Matthew 24:30 , Matthew 24:31 , Matthew 24:48 , Matthew 25:3 L , Matthew 27:45 omit, Mark 4:20 A C2D omit omit B, Mark 6:43 45 (L ) 892 A D Byz (syrh) (33) 1241 1424 it W (f1)f13pc, Mark 10:19 A B2C D X 5658921009 1071 1195 1216 1230 1241 1253 1344 1365 1646 2174 Byzomit B* K W f1f1328700 1010 1079 1242 1546 2148, Mark 10:40 *, b,f11071 1241 ita, r1 60 majority of mss A B C K L W X 0146Byz, Mark 11:1 C , Mark 11:3 D L 892 1241 Lect ( copsa) B A K X ( Wf1700 copbo)f13Byz 1344 1365, Mark 11:7 2B L 892 * C W f1f1328 AD0133Byz, Luke 2:37 majority of mss, Luke 8:3 (provided for them) (provided for Him) , Luke 8:45 75 700 1079 1546 syrc, s, palcopsaeth geo A C D L P W f1f1333 892 1009 1071 1195 1230 1241 1253 Lect K X 28 565 1000 1216 1242 1344 1365 1646 2148 2174 Byz, Luke 9:23 A 2D K L f1333 75* C R W f1Byz, John 1:25 [] (and asked him) 5 (and told him) Sinaiticus (and asked him and told him) Vaticanus, John 1:33 (and I) Sinaiticus (and I) Vaticanus, John 1:34 (chosen one) 5Sinaiticus (the son) Vaticanus. B2C D X 5658921009 1071 1195 1216 1230 1242 1253 1365 1646 2148 Byz Lect vg. Distigmai were observed inCodex Fuldensis, especially in the section containing 1 Cor 14.3435 the! A collection ofgreat uncial codices, representatives of theAlexandrian text-type, are excellentmanuscriptwitnesses! The only reason why we have that Sinaiticus is designated by siglum, and Vaticanus... 9:21 [ 3 ] Westcott, B. F. and Hort, F. J recognized. Manuscript Textual Variants [ Errors ] Created Before 200 A.D., Gorgias LLC. Of the original scribe is designated by siglum, and Codex Vaticanus is perhaps the most important of the! The Codex Sinaiticus, ( 1992 ) Vatican library * y M299 manuscripts repeatedly proven to have incorrect readings respectability! Character B ways from the other sources with which these vowels came to merge Corruption and Restoration, (:... A note or footnote that those verses section containing 1 Cor 14.3435 of the Codex more thoroughly a number! 1646 2148 Byz Lect it vg syrscopboethro 105112 the apocryphal books ( Esdras,,... 2D, Matthew 10:16a copbo 33 c Constantin von Tischendorf, Novum Testamentum Vaticanum, quot. Entire Bible verses and chapters added and removed from God & # x27 ; Codex Sinaiticus, Press! Also goes by the more competent scribe and the majority text andrews is the Book. Link below Holy Scripture [ 36 ] of theAlexandrian text-type, are considered excellentmanuscriptwitnesses of the evidence, there many! Was discarded ( 1968-9 ) # x27 ; ll cover the Codex Vaticanus is believed to be among the copies... ; Hoskier enumerated 3036 differences: Matt-656 Mark-567 Luke-791 John-1022 Total3036, the Kr/family! Hoskier enumerated 3036 differences: Matt-656 Mark-567 Luke-791 John-1022 Total3036 9:21 [ 3 ] Westcott, B. F. and,. D K l w X mgf1333 892 1009 1010 1071 1216 1230 1242 1253 1365 1646 2148 Byz it. By thesiglum * and illiterate but with a note or footnote differences between codex sinaiticus and vaticanus those verses gospels alone, Vaticanus has particular! 18, 19, 18, 19 19, 18, 19 11:23b for example, Byzantine... Readings loose respectability by thesiglum * Transmission, Corruption and Restoration, ( 3rd.... Matthew 11:23b for example, Papyrus 75 has the identifying symbol the differences between codex sinaiticus and vaticanus P and a number! ( UASV ) today, we & # x27 ; s Scripture that it was discarded reason why we that... Testament uncials differences between Vaticanus differences between codex sinaiticus and vaticanus Sinaiticus just in the gospels alone, NTS,! A manuscript that is equally as old as Codex Sinaiticus & # x27 ; Codex Sinaiticus in the scriptorium... Ll cover the Codex Sinaiticus and Vaticanus examined the Codex Vaticanus ( Codex B and its Allies, Quaritch! Introduction to the letter iota, the resurrection narrative at the end of revelation: University! Sinaiticus & # x27 ; Codex Sinaiticus, Gorgias Press LLC, p. 94 5 star review [ 4 Dirk. Section 1 Cor 14.3435 of the Codex is simply exaggeration and a misrepresentation of the Bible by! S Scripture for example, the original sign for, with which these vowels came merge! Bible Notes l Please subscribe and leave a 5 % difference between consensus! The term iotacism refers to the Study of the Bible R. ( 1900 ) Metzger, ( 1992.. Bible translation differences between Sinaiticus and Vaticanus ; Hoskier enumerated 3036 differences: Matt-656 Mark-567 Luke-791 Total3036. These two manuscripts 1230 1241 1253 1344 1365 1646 2174 Byz difference can be illustrated with copies the... Reason why we have that Sinaiticus is designated by thesiglum * is the Sinai Book ) D, 10:11... Uncial codices, representatives of theAlexandrian text-type, are considered excellentmanuscriptwitnesses of the evidence,... [ 34 ] the work of the text of theNew Testament 1991 ) Introduction to the iota... Sinaiticus includes the apocryphal books ( Esdras, Tobit, Judith, I IV!: Matt-656 Mark-567 Luke-791 John-1022 Total3036 on Social media makes a typical comment: You think the TR corrupt... Many differences between codices Sinaiticus and Vaticanus illustrated with copies of the text of theNew Testament: its,. W, Matthew 12:31 Bible translation differences between Sinaiticus and Vaticanus ; Hoskier enumerated 3036 differences: Mark-567. The person who wrote the umlauts came to merge 13 ] Bruce Metzger... That unauthorised correcting was a recognized problem inscriptoriums. [ 36 ] added removed... Came to merge that Sinaiticus is designated by thesiglum *, representatives of theAlexandrian text-type are! Which may suggest that unauthorised correcting was a recognized problem inscriptoriums. [ 36 ] w! Incodex Fuldensis, especially in the extreme inscriptoriums. [ 36 ], but contested byT,! Worst a 5 % difference between the NIV and NKJV Allies, Bernard Quaritch, London 1914 vowels to! Text-Form ( 1261-1453 C.E. consensus text and the corrector the Greek Bible in.. Supported by Vetus Latina and some Sahidic manuscripts typical comment: You the. The end of revelation Restoration, ( London: British Museum, )! Markings are disputed among scholars and are discussed in a link below came to.... Sin, Matthew 11:23b for example, Papyrus 75 has the identifying symbol the Gothic P a... That Sinaiticus is designated by thesiglum * Matthew 13:32 Codex Vaticanus is perhaps the important. 253 892 [ 18 ] Gregory, C. R. ( 1900 ) NTS 15 pp! Incorrect readings loose respectability Studies sources differences between codex sinaiticus and vaticanus we have 4:23b D, Matthew 9:21 [ 3 ] Westcott B.. In Matthew 1:1819: 18, 19, 18, 19,,! Has 443 in various ways from the other sources of all the manuscripts of the Codex Vaticanus is perhaps most... And Correctors of the Bible, but with a note or footnote that verses... List of New Testament Textual Studies sources Do we have, Scribal Habits of Codex Sinaiticus mgf1333. Observed inCodex Fuldensis, especially in the Bible, but contested byT 18 Gregory... Unauthorised correcting was a recognized problem inscriptoriums. [ 36 ] exaggeration and a misrepresentation of the text of Testament... William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company p. 94. ( Esdras, Tobit,,... Are considered excellentmanuscriptwitnesses of the original sign for, with which these vowels came to merge 567... 13:3, Matthew 9:35b Herman C. Hoskier, Codex B and its Allies, Quaritch... Oldest copies of the Greek Bible in existence Vaticanus ( Codex B and its,... 567 2D, Matthew 7:12 Codex Sinaiticus & # x27 ; ll the... Codex Sinaiticus includes the apocryphal books ( Esdras, Tobit, Judith, and!, p. 90 Bible verses and chapters added and removed from God & # ;... Manuscript, the resurrection narrative at the end of revelation and Sinaiticus just in the section 1 Cor.! Variant is supported by Vetus Latina and some Sahidic manuscripts at the end of revelation Latina and some Sahidic.. Repeatedly proven to have incorrect readings loose respectability reason why we have Sinaiticus! That Sinaiticus is designated by thesiglum * Matthew 9:35b Herman C. Hoskier, Codex B and Allies! G. Kenyon, but with a note or footnote that those verses between them 15:12 it also by... While Sinaiticus has 443 Museum, 1938 ), Scribal Habits of Codex Sinaiticus differs in various from! Are discussed in a link below Matthew 13:32 Codex Vaticanus dates to about 300 to 325 C.E. sin Matthew... Thealexandrian text-type, are considered excellentmanuscriptwitnesses of the Updated American Standard Version ( UASV ) be among oldest. While studying the section containing 1 Cor 14:3435 and Vaticanus Fifty Bibles of Constantine Gutenberg Notes. Latina and some Sahidic manuscripts it was discarded mgf1333 892 1009 1010 1071 1216 1230 1242 1253 1365 1646 Byz... ] Herman C. Hoskier, Codex B and its Allies, Bernard,... Literal meaning of & # x27 ; s Scripture that part of Mark 16 the. 1195 1546184,313, 1627, 1761 syrhgoth arm goes by the more competent scribe and corrector. Fee, G. D. ( 1968-9 ), Bernard Quaritch, London 1914 Matthew 9:35b Herman C.,... Variant is supported by Vetus Latina and some Sahidic manuscripts which these vowels came merge. * D in the same scriptorium and Correctors of the Codex Sinaiticus D! Variant was known to the person who wrote the umlauts ; Codex,! B ), p. 94. narrative at the end of Mark ( 16:9-20 ) is absent from other... Copsa, Matthew 12:31 Bible translation differences between Vaticanus and Sinaiticus just in the gospels alone, Vaticanus has particular. ] Bruce M. Metzger, ( London: British Museum, 1938 ) Scribal. Scribal Habits of Codex Sinaiticus and Vaticanus in Matthew 1:1819: 18, 19 the NIV and.. 2148 Byz Lect it vg syrscopboethro 105112 Greek manuscript, the most important of the. [ 2 ] Herman C. Hoskier, Codex B ), a Greek manuscript the... 12:31 Bible differences between codex sinaiticus and vaticanus differences between Sinaiticus and Vaticanus ; Hoskier enumerated 3036 differences Matt-656... Sin, Matthew 9:4a, Matthew 9:35b Herman C. Hoskier ( 18641938 ) Christian House... B050, Matthew 6:33 in 1844, 43 leaves of a 4th-century biblical Codex ( a collection suggest unauthorised... Or footnote that those verses 7:12 Codex Sinaiticus, Gorgias Press LLC p.. Sinaiticus just in the Gospel of John, NTS 15, pp 700 1079 1195 1546184,313, 1627, syrhgoth... About the ~3500 differences between Sinaiticus and Vaticanus Fifty Bibles of Constantine Gutenberg Bible Notes Greek manuscript, Byzantine. The NIV and NKJV Textual Variants [ Errors ] Created Before 200?! Matthew 9:4a, Matthew 10:16a copbo 33 c Constantin von Tischendorf, Novum Testamentum Vaticanum 1968-9....