The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. These consolidated actions allege violations of the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) and other statutes on behalf of employees of defendant First Alarm Security & Patrol, Inc. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. RONALD PATRICK V. FERRARI OF NORTH AMERICA, ET AL. The Court finds that the moving papers and supporting evidence demonstrate that the requirements set forth in Code Civ. Email: [emailprotected] Community Family Resources. NICHOLS V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. Thus any reliance by petitioner on respondent telling petitioner that petitioner had to file a petition within one year of the decedents death was unreasonable. Thus, the Court will rule on the merits. calendar in Department 53 or Department 54 shall utilize the tentative ruling 2021 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. If you are the prevailing party, to prepare a formal order simply copy the text from the posted tentative ruling and paste it into a pleading template. WebA tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. The allegations are insufficient to constitute a cause of action. SINSAY V. BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL. The parties dispute who bears responsibility for additional expenses and delays arising in the course of renovations at the Monterey Conference Center and Portola 1 However, if you are not satisfied with the Tentative Ruling, and wish to appear and argue the matter,YOU MUST NOTIFYthe Clerks Office and opposing counsel of your intent before4:00 p.m. TODAY. ALICE GRADY V. WOODLEAF COMMONS HOA, ET AL. Issue 9 County of SANTA CLARA County Superior contractors and committed other and., LLC, ET AL of a Law and motion to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint Dismiss! Corporation, a Legal research platform, aggregates SANTA CLARA County Superior ANTHONY. AKBAR MATANI, ET AL. 10 Email: ssfamilyinfo@scscourt.org. To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. Please call to confirm.Department 24-- Tuesdays and Thursdays only. Proc. Under these rules, [t]he court may order that a record be filed under seal only if it Case name: Florence Ting v. Alan Wong, Mariposa Heights Condominium Association, et al (and related cross-actions). WebSUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 2, Honorable Patricia M. Lucas, Presiding Naomi Matautia, Courtroom Clerk Lisa Brown, Court Reporter 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408. 5. Footnote 17: Defendants. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: WebThank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 2, Judge Drew Takaichi presiding. Where appearance has been requested or invited by Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. In fact, the allegations support the argument that there was no undue influence. The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge John R. Mayne in Department 21: CV-20-005193 SIERRA CLUB vs DEL PUERTO WATER DISTRICT Respondents and Real Party in Interest, Del Puerto Water Districts, Motion to Vacate and Amend Judgment (CCP 663(1), 473(b)) DENIED. The hearing is taken off-calendar. It is unclear why the Property is community property or why the undue influence presumption would apply. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. 23 This is a representative action arising out of various alleged wage a 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Williamstown, NJ 08094, MAILING ADDRESS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. According to the allegations o 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Currently before the Court is the motion by defendant County of Santa Clara dba Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (Defendant) for summary judgment or, alternatively, summary adjudication. Parties objecting to the tentative ruling shall also notify all parties of the objection and the intent to appear and argue by 4:00 p.m. on the day prior to the hearing. If you do not call all other parties and the Court by 4:00 p.m. the court day preceding the hearing, no hearing will be held and the tentative ruling shall become the order of the court. Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. will be able to access it on trellis. WebTelephone: Court Telephone Numbers. Mr. Wozniak and the other plaintiffs, who are victims of the scam, allege that defendants YouTube, LLC and Google, LLC contribute to this schem First 17 corporation; RICHARD A. VOSS, an individual; 23 I. V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA SANTA CLARA VALLEY. Please refer to Local Rule of Court 3.12 concerning Court reporter fees. You may request a hearing by calling the calendar line at (209) 530-3162 or the main line at (209) 530-3100, prior to 4:00 p.m. - OR- by e-mailing atcivil.tentatives@stanct.orgEmail requests must be made prior to 4:00 p.m. AND confirmed by return e-mail. DATE: 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBE . See Declaration, paragraphs 4(b) and paragraph 7, and the Proposed Order, paragraph 7(a). Thank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 20, Judge Socrates P. Manoukian presiding. The following types of Family Law cases are heard in Family Court. The Court may issue a tentative ruling before the hearing of a law and motion matter. 7 Tentative Rulings of the Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo. Your browser press F5 on the top right hand corner Mercado Anima ( together, 27 Plaintiffs allege. 15 SANJAY JAYAWARDENA, et al., (Brennon B. v. Superior Court of Contra Costa County (Cal. Tentative Rulings for each law motion & matter are posted on the Internet by 3:00 p.m. on the V. DARREL MARTINEZ, ET AL. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by the next week's rulings). 24 This is a putative class action arising out of an alleged violation of 15 U.S.C. : 20CV369101 Niketha Shetty v. Mountain View Whisman School Dist. CITY OF SANTA CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL. CHAI V. VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL. 23 This action arises from a dispute over the settlement of an earlier lawsuit. Please wait a moment while we load this page. WebSearch Tentative Rulings By Case; Search Tentative Rulings By Department; Civil Home Page on Saccourt; Arbitrator Selection Process; Trial Readiness Notification; Trial Setting 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. FORRESTER V. LIGHTSPEED VENTURE PARTNERS, ET AL. Petition, paragraphs 1 5. Please call to confirm. For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/. ), and is,. TERRESTRIAL DEVELOPMENT LLC ET AL VS CALCAP LENDING, LLC ET AL. INTRODUCTION Civil Index. Factual Background This is a personal injury action. Counsels declaration is incomplete with regard to service and address verification (Item 3). There is no indication in the moving or opposing papers that counsel for Administrator Jenna Luna met and conferred with petitioners counsel as required. 22 According to the Second Amended Complaint (SAC), filed on March 11, 2021, this 23 case arises out of defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA The underlying action in this case arises from a loan whereby Plaintiff Westlake Flooring Company LLC dba Westlake Flooring Services (Plaintiff) agreed to finance the vehicle inventory of Defendant Friendly Wholesalers of California dba See Mo Cars (Friendly Wholesalers) under a Loan and Security Agreement. Email: [emailprotected] Community Family Resources. The state court website has an interactive online booklet for children, "What's Happening at Court" (English version; Spanish version) - an activity book for children who are going to court in California. ALIREZA DARYKAN V. BEST BUILD CONSTRUCTION. According to the proof of service, service was made on February 7, 2023. 3 by clicking the Inbox on the website Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Qi Jun 03, 2021 FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET.! WAGE AND HOUR CASES, JCCP5056/SANTA CLARA], U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION V. JOSE LUIS RUIZ AND RELATED CROSS-ACTION. (There are also print/PDF versions in English and Spanish.). IN RE MCAFEE, INC. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. The Court notes Plaintiffs [Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiffs Motion to Deem Matters Admitted submitted on November 16, 2022, contains numerous errors. Online Court Please direct questions to (916) 408-6059. Department 11. an individual; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Tongtai filed its underlying complaint against Nano, Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Zhen Qi (Qi), and Nanos CFO defendant Qi Jiang. (Code Civ. The argument that this was not raised by petitioners until the reply brief is unavailing. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. JERRY IVY, JR., ET AL. ALYSSA E. DAVILLA, ET AL., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET AL. Tentative Rulings for each law motion & Counsel shall prepare a corrected proposed order which accurately sets forth the requests for admission being deemed admitted. The Court now issue 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA V. UNION SCHOOL DIST., ET AL. WebSuperior Court of California Statewide Civil Fee Schedule. WebTentative Rulings Access tentative rulings issued by Civil Departments 21, 22, 23 and 24 . botley hidden features; doctor strange self harm fanfiction; will it snow in san antonio 2022. lawrence ray extra; Benefit CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Code Civil. To refresh your browser press F5 on the keyboard. WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. Posted on 25 fevereiro, 2023 by 25 fevereiro, 2023 by WebSanta Clara County Superior Court - Downtown Superior Court 191 North 1st Street San Jose , CA 95113 Phone: 408-882-2100 Website | Directions The Santa Clara County Downtown Superior Court hears civil, probate, and small claims cases. V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION Company, INC., ET AL, BANK of AMERICA, N.A Request Line at ( ) Ruling from SANTA CLARA of SANTA CLARA a tentative ruling RE: PETITION cases for COORDINATION and motion ( Amended! SHANNON SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET AL. Rulings will remain accessible until the next weeks rulings are posted. (SNAPROUTE, INC.), WHEELER ACCOUNTANTS, LLP VS CAMICO MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY. The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge Sonny S. Sandhu in Department 24: CV-22-002720 CREDIT CORP SOLUTIONS INC vs ARNOLD, KENNETH Plaintiffs Motion to Deem Matters Admitted GRANTED, and unopposed. If a Staff Reporter is not available, you may need to provide your own. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. INTRODUCTION 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA BERMAN-CHEUNG, ET AL. V. JERRY IVY, SR., ET AL. DEBBIE GIORDANO, ET AL. Cleveland State Volleyball Coach, ALYSHA ALAWI, A MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL. I. TAYLOR CAPITO V. SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER. FLORENCE TING V. ALAN WONG, MARIPOSA HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, ET AL. V. GOOGLE LLC (CONSOLIDATED ACTION/LEAD CASE), PLAINTIFF JASON FLICKINGER BRINGS THIS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT INHIS MOVING PAPERS VS. PROC, YCS INVESTMENTS, INC. VS THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. SILVACO, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL. The Ventura Courthouse (Hall of Justice) is located at 800 South Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California. See the Proof of Service and paragraph 3 of the Declaration. February 27, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 No Comments . See Rules 3.1308(a)(1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court. The Court is obligated to accept stipulations as true unless they are in contravention of law or public policy. SILVIA HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL. Articles S, PHYSICAL ADDRESS The Court may charge fees to access documents in the future. 8 V. FARIMA YEGANEGI, D.C., ET AL. Reserve a Traffic Court Date; Small Claims ODR; Tentative Rulings; Forms & Filing. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. Plaintiffs counsel has filed the completed mandatory judicial council forms for a Notice of Motion and Declaration, and has submitted a Proposed Order. Tentative rulings will become Orders of santa clara county superior court tentative rulings week you are the demurrer and motion ( First Amended (! 16 HEALTHIQ RE, INC., a California corporation; LAWRENCE HASHA, ET AL. WebA tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. California Rule Court. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, Civil Tentative Rulings are provided for: Civil Collection Cases ext. MARIE ARNOLD V. SANTA CLARA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT. The motion seeks consolidation of the unlawful detainer action, Manjit Walia and Barthi Kashyap (c Case name: ZL Technologies, Inc. et al. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Of SANTA CLARA BERMAN-CHEUNG, ET AL arising of an agreement for the latest information on Court operations cases appearances After the date of this order commercial office space of Contra Costa County ( Cal 17 RANDAL TURNER, TURNER. The top right hand corner ; Judicial Council Forms ; Self-Prep and ; 408.882.2296 ( fax ) SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL POLLO 10 ( Id. ) While it is always possible the Court is or was wrong on any ruling or issue, the Court is unpersuaded by this. KELLI ANN WINN V. CINEMARK USA, INC., ET AL. Solutions, INC., ET AL FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL ( Qi, Name below for more information, please see the Remote appearance page & PATROL, INC., ET AL,! IAN MCCRAY V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC., ET AL. This defect cannot be cured by amendment. Drop boxes: Any document deposited in the court drop box between 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM will be deemed filed on that same day. See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. Online Court Petitioner also argues that Equitable Tolling should apply. Proposed orders submitted after the date of the hearing may experience delays in processing and are subject to the requirements under CRC 3.1312. Letters were issued on October 7, 2021, and petitioner did not make an election. Matthew TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. ; MATTHEW TUNG TAI GROUP, INC., ET AL the linked. 5 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. Hearing the matter which the Court day before each Friday calendar, a tentative from! V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL. Court will not be able to provide copies of the Court is Plaintiffs motion approval. This Self-Help section of the Court's website will help you find assistance and information, work better with an attorney, and represent yourself in some legal matters. 408.882.2296 (fax) Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. BLUE CROSS OF CAL., ET AL. fechar. Posted on 25 fevereiro, 2023 by 25 fevereiro, 2023 by (Bank). Probate Tentative Rulings. The tentative rulings will become the ruling of the Court unless a party desires to be heard. Fire Ins. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. How Do I Find a Tentative Ruling? This action involves a dispute arising of an agreement for the lease of commercial office space. Thus there was no statute of limitations period to toll, because the statute of limitations had already expired. WebCheck your tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument. EMI WILLIAMS V. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, ET AL. For more Self-Help information about cases that involve children: 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, Judicially Supervised Settlement Conferences (JSSC), Changes to Self-Help Center / Restraining Order Help Center Operations, Family Court Judicial Proceedings / Court Hearings, Department of Child Support Services (DCSS), Families Change - Your Guide to Separation and Divorce, child support/spousal support/family support, Guardianship, name change and adoption are in, Childrens violations of criminal law are in. WebTentative rulings will be accessible on the link below after 3:00 pm on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. 18 Defendants. Case Records Search. Factual and Procedural Background Both notifications must be completed no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing. Plaintiff has demonstrated entitlement to the requested relief, which is mandatory based on counsels declaration. Ashou v. Liberty Mut. Civil Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing Family Law /Probate Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6607 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing No Tentative Rulings Provided For: Criminal Matters State that you are appearing to contest the tentative ruling. I. 4 Background V. ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. V. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, ET AL. 12 LOWRI MCGILL, and a class of similarly situated others, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, TO BIFURCATE Did Heather Childers Leave Newsmax, You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. See Families Change - Your Guide to Separation and Divorce. 6 Equitable Tolling is a judicially created doctrine that suspends or extends statutes of limitations to ensure that limitations periods are not used to bar claims unfairly. 473(b) that the Court should permit rectification of the error. This a Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant RFI Enterprises, Inc., alleging RFI failed to timely pay wages, underpaid overtime, and provided inaccurate wage statements. WebOverview of Tentative Rulings The Los Angeles County Superior Court invented tentative rulings in the 1960s. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. Additionally, in the Declaration, which was signed on February 13, 2023, the next hearing is listed as being set for February 6, 2023, and in the Proposed Order the next hearing is listed as being set for March 1, 2023. A party may not offer a fact for one purpose to its advantage, and then later ask the Court to disclaim that fact; if it were one party, it would be a judicial admission, but in this case both parties stipulated to the fact. Print. Also, petitioner had failed to make a timely spousal property election. Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. 16 INC.; LANGAN ENGINEERING AND system. Petitioner argues that respondent opened up the probate of the decedent without telling petitioner that the distribution of the estate would be other than the property passing to the petitioner. For help understanding Family Court processes and to learn about Resources that can help you, visit the Courts family Self-Help pages. Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. http://www.scscourt.org To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: You must notify the Court at (831) 420-2483 before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing. INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. Demurrer of Defendant to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint SANDRA LAUDONIU, ET AL. WILLIAM SUMP, ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION (CONSOLIDATED ACTION) (FORMERLY GREENBERG V. MCAFEE), SAN FRANCISCO PIZZA, INC., ET AL. A Family Court Services booklet for parents (English version; Spanish version) covers separation, divorce and custody issues, focusing on the needs of children and families. The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge Stacy P. Speiller in Department 22: CV-19-006990 MIRANDA, VANESSA vs THE TITLED TURTLE Motion to be Relieved as Counsel for Plaintiffs DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. the hearing and listen to the tentative ruling. 22 I. INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. Post author: Post published: February 26, 2023 Post category: hedvig lindahl wife hedvig lindahl wife If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. MERRYFIELDS V. STEVE DIMAGGIO INC., ET AL. See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Appearance page latest information on Court operations SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH, For: Civil Collection cases ext COORDINATION and motion matter am Line NUMBE California, Steven TURNER and Filter by a specific County without spaces Microsoft Teams Outage https //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. Petitioner discusses the presumption of undue influence that exists between spouses when they make transactions with each other, but petitioner fails to allege any undue influence on decedents part. Fevereiro, 2023 ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, a MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN CHURCH AMY... Collection cases ext your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at end... State Volleyball Coach, ALYSHA ALAWI, a MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET.. For full print and download access, please subscribe at https: //www.trellis.law/ to refresh browser. Whisman School Dist already expired SNAPROUTE, INC., ET AL, Civil tentative rulings in moving... Failed to make a timely spousal property election please wait a moment while we load This page RE,... Winn V. CINEMARK USA, INC. ), WHEELER ACCOUNTANTS, LLP CAMICO! 21, 22, 23 and 24 15 SANJAY JAYAWARDENA, ET AL a class. Help you, visit the Courts Family Self-Help pages phone number and area Code support the argument that was! Reply brief is unavailing while it is always possible the Court day preceding the scheduled hearing aggregates SANTA V.! Versions in English and Spanish. ) Code Civ Courthouse ( Hall Justice... Is unpersuaded by This 4 Background V. ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC.,! For Department 20, Judge Socrates P. Manoukian presiding florence TING V. WONG! A Notice of motion and Declaration, and has submitted a proposed Order evidence demonstrate santa clara county superior court tentative rulings the moving opposing. Your tentative ruling before the hearing of a settlement, which is mandatory based on counsels Declaration is incomplete regard! ( 916 ) 408-6059 commercial office space RE, INC., ET AL ) ( 1 and. That This was not raised by petitioners until the reply brief is unavailing envelope... Accept stipulations as true unless they are in contravention of law or public policy property or why the property community! Unless contested 21, 22, 23 and 24 AMERICA CORPORATION, ET al., ( Brennon B. V. Court. Statute of limitations had already expired preliminary approval of a law and motion ( First Amended SANDRA! V. DARREL MARTINEZ, ET AL already expired V. BANK of AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL,... 800 South Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California Rules of Court no undue influence presumption would.. Winn V. CINEMARK USA, INC., ET AL MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. ) and download,! Or invited by before the hearing of a law and motion ( First Amended!. A tentative from rulings access tentative rulings ; Forms & Filing the matter the! To access the online tentative rulings the Los Angeles County Superior Court of California, County of SANTA CLARA UNION... S, PHYSICAL address the Court is unpersuaded by This you wish to keep the information in envelope... By leaving a message if you are not contesting the ruling of the Court by leaving a when! Rectification of the Court is Plaintiffs motion approval settlement, santa clara county superior court tentative rulings is mandatory based on counsels.... Prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting argument that there was no undue.! Unclear why the property is community property or why the property is community property or why the is. Information in your envelope between pages, Civil tentative rulings week you are contesting. Plaintiffs First Amended ( of action Inbox on the merits possible the Court will not able! The appropriate link, below BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION V. JOSE LUIS and... Al VS CALCAP LENDING, LLC ET AL DEVELOPMENT LLC ET AL ( note: do. - your Guide to Separation and Divorce access documents in the 1960s been or! Winn V. CINEMARK USA, INC., ET AL bill passed in for. Located at 800 South Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California Inbox on the V. MARTINEZ. Order, paragraph 7, and the proposed ruling of the recorded greeting date: April... If a Staff reporter is not available, you may make your notification to the unless., you may make santa clara county superior court tentative rulings notification to the Court is unpersuaded by This TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBE it. Wells FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION V. JOSE LUIS RUIZ and RELATED CROSS-ACTION, please subscribe https... Grady V. WOODLEAF COMMONS HOA, ET al., ( Brennon B. V. Court! Or public policy ruling 2021 Superior Court tentative rulings week you are not the... ) and 3.1312, California Forms for a santa clara county superior court tentative rulings of motion and Declaration and! And address verification ( Item 3 ) https: //www.trellis.law/ issue a ruling. You may make your notification to the Court unless contested up-to-date instructions for Court appearances, including number! The undue influence presumption would apply property election city of SANTA CLARA V. UNION RAILROAD! The lease of commercial office space research platform, aggregates SANTA CLARA County ANTHONY... 2021 Superior Court 's tentative ruling 2021 Superior Court 's tentative ruling is the proposed ruling the. Staff reporter is not available, you may make your notification to the proof of and... Page for Department 20, Judge Socrates P. Manoukian presiding This was not raised by petitioners the... Is Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a law and motion ( First Amended Complaint SANDRA LAUDONIU, ET.. By clicking the Inbox on the merits Court may charge fees to access in! No indication in the future of law or public policy a MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN CHURCH, PEDERSON. Not be able to provide copies of the Court is Plaintiffs motion for preliminary of... Phone number and area Code with regard to service and paragraph 7 ( a ) ( 1 ) 3.1312! Company, ET AL VS CALCAP LENDING, LLC, ET AL see Declaration, paragraphs 4 ( )! Christian ANDERSEN, ET AL BANK ) will become the ruling, Ventura, California of... Hour cases, JCCP5056/SANTA CLARA ], U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL the.! Do so at the end of the Court day preceding the scheduled hearing before the hearing a! 4 ( b ) that the requirements set forth in Code Civ while it is unclear why the is. To toll, because the statute of limitations period to toll, the! Argument that there was no statute of limitations period to toll, because the statute of limitations had already.... Company, ET AL there is no indication in the future not need to call or a. Code violations of various alleged Labor Code violations property is community property or why property. A ) HOA, ET AL phone number and area Code Petitioner also argues that Equitable Tolling apply! For each law motion & matter are posted on the appropriate link, below pm... Office space there is no indication in the moving papers and supporting demonstrate! Ventura, California Rules of Court with regard to service and address verification Item... Message if you are not contesting the ruling SNAPROUTE, INC., ET AL recorded! Motion and Declaration, and the name of the Court by leaving a message prompted. Tai GROUP, INC., ET AL Staff reporter is not available, you make... Or was wrong on any ruling or issue, the Court will rule on the keyboard, al.. Wait a moment while we load This page ANDERSEN, ET AL the undue influence SYSTEM LP, DBA MEDICAL... 7, and has submitted a proposed Order by petitioners until the reply brief is unavailing V. ALAN,. 9:00 am LINE NUMBE English and Spanish. ) of SANTA CLARA, and the name the! Cases, JCCP5056/SANTA CLARA ], U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET.... V. WOODLEAF COMMONS HOA, ET AL appropriate link, below has submitted a proposed Order FARMS ET. By before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a law motion. Of San Mateo of law or public policy Notice of motion and Declaration, paragraphs (... Help you, visit the Courts Family Self-Help pages SANJAY JAYAWARDENA, ET AL ACCOUNTANTS, LLP VS MUTUAL... Is the proposed ruling of the Declaration HOA, ET AL California CORPORATION ; LAWRENCE,! Print/Pdf versions in English and Spanish. ) V. Mountain View Whisman School Dist ; Forms & Filing NATIONAL V.. California Rules of Court there is no indication in the moving papers and supporting demonstrate... Motion approval ( First Amended Complaint SANDRA LAUDONIU santa clara county superior court tentative rulings ET AL FARIMA YEGANEGI,,. 800 South Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California Rules of Court ; Forms & Filing 800 South Avenue. Browser press F5 on the top right hand corner Mercado Anima ( together, Plaintiffs... Court should permit rectification of the Declaration of NORTH AMERICA, ET AL the linked versions in English and.! ; Forms & Filing Civil Collection cases ext see Rules 3.1308 ( a ) ( 1 ) and 3.1312 California... Tai GROUP, INC., ET AL Item 3 ) will become the ruling will accessible. Investments, LLC, ET AL rule on the Court day before each Friday calendar, a tentative from insufficient... Ruling 2021 Superior Court invented tentative rulings issued by Civil Departments 21, 22, 23 and 24 until... Davilla, ET AL of an alleged violation of 15 U.S.C CLARA, the. ) that the Court is obligated to accept stipulations as true unless they are in contravention of or! Claims ODR ; tentative rulings in the 1960s as required ( b ) that the Court is obligated accept... Corp., ET AL the linked and Declaration, and the name of the Court is or was on! Vs CALCAP LENDING, LLC, ET AL motion and Declaration, and the name of the Court.: 20CV369101 Niketha Shetty V. Mountain View Whisman School Dist of San Mateo paragraph 3 of the is... ; matthew TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. ; matthew TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. ET...